![]() ![]() That’s for natural fibers, but the upsides are greater for materials like polyester or nylon, which are generally made from petroleum and trickier to dye. Its microorganisms are engineered to produce specific colors and then brewed in vats like beer.Ī third-party life cycle analysis (paid for by Colorifix) found its dyes use at least 49% less water and 35% less electricity than conventional cotton dyeing processes, apparently slashing carbon emissions by 31%. coli) to naturally deposit dyes directly onto fabrics. One such company, Colorifix, just got a boost via a $22.6 million (£18 million) Series B round, led by Swedish fashion giant H&M.Ĭolorifix stands out for its progress in using microbes (such as E. The environmental crises linked to textiles have given rise to several firms that aim to reimagine dyeing altogether. Wastewater treatment, when it happens, is just one of the energy-intensive (read: carbon-spewing) processes that make fast fashion possible. ![]() That’s because textiles usually get their hues from toxic chemicals, and the resulting wastewater - laden with dyes, acids and formaldehyde - destroys rivers, such as those surrounding Dhaka, the capital city of Bangladesh. ![]() Bacterial secretions might dye your future wardrobe, and that’d be an improvement. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |